Main Article Content

Abstract

In this study, the effects of oral administration of probiotic Bacillus sp. D2.2 and prebiotic from sweet potato extract on growth performance and resistance against Vibrio harveyi in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) were investigated. During 32-day feeding experiment, 360 individuals of Pacific white shrimp (PL15) with initial weight of 0.02 ± 0.002 g were fed with basal diet as control (A); supplemented with 6% probiotic and 0% prebiotic (B); 6% probiotic and 2% prebiotic (C); 6% probiotic and 4% prebiotic (D). At the end of feeding trial, weight gain (WG), average daily growth (ADG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and survival rate (SR) were assessed. WG, ADG and FCR of the shrimp were significantly better in treatment D than those of the shrimp in other treatments. Control and treatment D as the best feeding trial were selected for challenge test with infectious V. harveyi. Survival rate and mean time to death (MTD) of the shrimp fed the supplemented diet were not significantly different (P>0.05) to the control. Infection levels in shrimp were evaluated using morphological scoring methods. Infection levels of V. harveyi in shrimp fed the diet were lower compared to the control.

Keywords

Disease resistance; Growth; Prebiotic; Probiotic Bacillus sp. D2.2

Article Details

Author Biographies

Esti Harpeni, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Marine Science Study Program

Limin Santoso, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Aquaculture Study Program,

Supono Supono, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Ari Widodo, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Aquaculture Study Program,

Laksmita Yolanda, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Aquaculture Study Program

Wardiyanto Wardiyanto, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Aquaculture Study Program, University

References

  1. Adel, M., S. Yeganeh, M.A.O. Dawood, R. Safari,
  2. and S. Radhakrishnan. 2017. Effects of
  3. Pediococcus pentosaceus supplementation on
  4. growth performance, intestinal microflora and
  5. disease resistance of white shrimp, Litopenaeus
  6. vannamei. Aquaculture Nutrition, 23(6): 1401-
  7. Ai, Q., H. Xu, K. Mai, W. Xu, J. Wang, and W.
  8. Zhang. 2011. Effects of dietary
  9. supplementation of Bacillus subtilis and
  10. fructooligosaccharide on growth performance,
  11. survival, non-specific immune response and
  12. disease resistance of juvenile large yellow
  13. croaker, Larimichthys crocea, Aquaculture,
  14. :155-161.
  15. Arisa, I.I. 2011. Application of probiotic, prebiotic
  16. and synbiotic to enhance the immune
  17. response of shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei
  18. against Vibrio harveyi infection. Master
  19. Thesis, Bogor Agricultural University,
  20. Indonesia.
  21. Azhar, F. 2013. The effects of probiotic and prebiotic
  22. on performance of juvenile polkadot grouper
  23. Cromileptes alvelis. Buletin Veteriner
  24. Udayana, 6: 1-9.
  25. Bell, T. A. and D.V. Lightner. 1988. A handbook of
  26. normal penaeid shrimp histology (No. 595.38
  27. B4). Word Aquaculture Society, 114p.
  28. Bengmark, S. 2005. Bioecologic control of the
  29. gastrointestinal tract: the role of flora and
  30. supplemented probiotics and synbiotics.
  31. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America,
  32. :413-436.
  33. Cerezuela, R., F.A. Guardiola, J. Meseguer, and
  34. M.A. Esteban. 2012. Increases in immune
  35. parameters by inulin and Bacillus subtilis
  36. dietary administration to gilthead seabream
  37. (Sparus aurata L.) did not correlate with
  38. disease resistance to Photobacterium damselae.
  39. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 32:1032-1040.
  40. Daniels, C.L., D. L. Merrifield, D.P. Boothroyd,
  41. S.J. Davies, J.R. Factor, and K.E. Arnold.
  42. Effect of dietary Bacillus spp. and
  43. mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) onEuropean
  44. Lobster (Homarus gammarus L.) larvae
  45. growth performance, gut morphology and gut
  46. microbiota. Aquaculture, 304:49-57.
  47. Dimitroglou, A., D.L Merrifield, R. Moate, S.J.
  48. Davies, P. Spring, J. Sweetman, and G.
  49. Bradley. 2009. Dietary mannan oligosaccharide
  50. supplementation modulates intestinal microbial
  51. ecology and improves gut morphology of
  52. rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss
  53. (Walbaum). Journal of animal science, 87(10):
  54. -3234.
  55. Gibson, G., H. Probert, J. Loo, R. Rastall, and M.
  56. Roberfroid. 2004. Dietary modulation of the
  57. human colonic microbiota: Updating the
  58. concept of prebiotics. Nutrition Research
  59. Reviews, 17(2):259-275. doi:10.1079/NRR200479.
  60. Gibson G.R. and M.B. Roberfroid. 1995. Dietary
  61. modulation of the human colonic microbiota:
  62. introducing the concept of prebiotics. Journal
  63. of Nutrition, 125: 1401-1412.
  64. Hai, N.V. and R. Fotedar. 2009. Comparison of the
  65. effects of prebiotics (Bio-Mos® and ß-1, 3-
  66. D-glucan) and the customized probiotics
  67. (Pseudomonas synxantha and P. aeruginosa)
  68. on the culture of juvenile western king prawn
  69. (Penaeus latisulcatus Kishinouye, 1896).
  70. Aquaculture, 289:310-316.
  71. Hardiyani, S., E. Harpeni, A. Setyawan and
  72. Supono. 2016. Pathogebicity and in vivo
  73. study of local isolate Bacillus sp. D2.2 at the
  74. vannamei culture (Litopenaeus vannamei).
  75. Aquasains, 5(1): 421-425.
  76. Harpeni, E., A. Setyawan, L. Santoso and Z. Arifin.
  77. Efektivitas ekstrak tepung ubi jalar
  78. sebagai media teknis bakteri probiotik.
  79. Proceeding Seminar Nasional MIPA 2016:
  80. - 130. Jatinangor, 27-28 Oktober 2016.
  81. Joshi, J., J. Srisala, V.H. Truong, I.T. Chen, B.
  82. Nuangsaeng, O. Suthienkul, C.F. Lo, T.W.
  83. Flegel, K. Sritunyalucksana, and S.
  84. Thitamadee. 2014. Variation in Vibrio
  85. parahaemolyticus isolates from a single Thai
  86. shrimp farm experiencing an outbreak of
  87. acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease
  88. (AHPND). Aquaculture, 428: 297-302.
  89. Khimmakthong, U., P. Deachamag, A. Phongdara,
  90. and W. Chotigeat. 2011. Stimulating the
  91. immune response of using the phagocytosis
  92. activating protein (PAP) gene, Fish &
  93. Shellfish Immunology, 31(3): 415-422.
  94. Li J.Q., B.P. Tan and K.S. Mai. 2009. Dietary probiotic
  95. Bacillus OJ and isomaltooligo saccharides
  96. influence the intestine microbial populations,
  97. immune responses and resistance to white spot
  98. syndrome virus in shrimp (Litopenaeus
  99. vannamei). Aquaculture. 291: 35-40.
  100. Li P., G.S. Burr, D.M III. Gatlin, M.E. Hume, S.
  101. Patnaik, F.L. Castille, and A.L. Lawrence.
  102. Dietary supplementation of short-chain fructooligosaccharides influences gastrointestinal
  103. microbiota composition and immunity
  104. characteristics of Pacific white shrimp,
  105. Litopenaeus vannamei, cultured in a
  106. recirculating system. Journal of Nutrition,
  107. : 2763-2768.
  108. Liu, H., Z. Li, B. Tan, Y. Lao, Z. Duan, W. Sun,
  109. and X. Dong. 2014. Isolation of a putative
  110. probiotic strain S12 and its effect on growth
  111. performance, non-specific immunity and
  112. disease-resistance of white shrimp, Litopenaeus
  113. vannamei. Fish & shellfish immunology, 41(2):
  114. -307.
  115. Nitimulyo, K.H., A. Isnansetyo, Triyanto, M.
  116. Murdjani, and L. Sholichah. 2005.
  117. Efektivitas vaksin polivalen untuk pengendalian
  118. vibriosis pada kerapu tikus (Cromileptes
  119. altivelis). J. Fish. Sci., 7(2): 95-100.
  120. Nurhayati, D., Widanarni, and M. Yuhana. 2015.
  121. Dietary symbiotic influence on growth
  122. performances and immune responses to co-
  123. infection with infectious myonecrosis virus
  124. and Vibrio harveyi in Litopenaeus vannamei.
  125. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science,
  126. (1): 13-23.
  127. Oktaviana, A., Widanarni and Yuhana, M. 2014.
  128. The Use of Synbiotics to Prevent IMNV and
  129. Vibrio harveyi Co-Infection in Litopenaeus
  130. vannamei. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences, 21(3):
  131. -134.
  132. Partida-Aranguere, B.O., A. Luna-Gonzalez, J.A.
  133. Fierro-Coronado, M. del-Carmen Flores-
  134. Miranda, and H.A. Gonzalez-Ocampo. 2013.
  135. Effect of inulin and probiotic bacteria on
  136. growth, survival, immune response, and
  137. prevalence of white spot syndrome virus
  138. (WSSV) in Litopenaeus vannamei cultured
  139. under laboratory conditions. Afr. J.
  140. Biotechnol., 12: 3366–3375.
  141. Rengpipat, S., W. Phianphak, S. Piyatiratitivorakul,
  142. and P. Menasveta. 1998. Effects of a probiotic
  143. bacterium on black tiger shrimp (Penaeus
  144. vannamei) survival and growth. Aquaculture,
  145. : 301–313.
  146. Rengpipat, S., S. Rukpratanporn, S.
  147. Piyatiratitivorakul, and P. Menasveta.
  148. Immunity enhancement in black tiger
  149. shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) by a probiont
  150. bacterium Bacillus S11. Aquaculture, 191:
  151. –288.
  152. Rengpipat, S., A. Tunyamum, A.W. Fast, S.
  153. Piyatiratitivoraku, and P. Menasveta.
  154. Enhanced growth and resistance to
  155. vibrio challenge in pond-reared black tiger
  156. shrimp Penaeus monodon fed a Bacillus
  157. probiotic. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 55:
  158. -173.
  159. Ringo, E., R.E. Olsen, T.O. Gifstad, R.A. Dalmo,
  160. H. Amlund, G.I. Hemre, and A.M. Bakke.
  161. Prebiotics in aquaculture: A review.
  162. Aquacult. Nutr., 16: 117-136.
  163. Setyawan, A., E. Harpeni, M. Ali, D. Mariska, and
  164. M. Aji. 2014. Potensi agen bakteri biokontrol
  165. indigenous tambak tradisional udang windu
  166. (Penaeus monodon) di Lampung Timur strain
  167. D.2.2, terhadap bakteri patogen pada udang
  168. dan ikan. Prosiding Pertemuan Ahli
  169. Kesehatan Ikan 2014. Serang 11-13 Februari
  170. pp. 24-31.
  171. Soccol, C.R., L.P.d.S. Vandenberghe, M.R. Spier,
  172. A.B.P. Medeiros, C.T. Yamaguishi, J.D.D.
  173. Lindner, A. Pandey, and V. Thomaz-Soccol.
  174. The potential of probiotics: a
  175. review. Food Technology and Biotechnology,
  176. (4):413-434.
  177. Sukenda, R. Praseto, and Widanarni. 2015.
  178. Efektivitas sinbiotik dengan dosis berbeda
  179. pada pemeliharaan udang vaname di tambak.
  180. Jurnal Akuakultur Indonesia,14(1): 1-8.
  181. Sun, Y., Wen, Z., Li, X., Meng, N., Mi, R., Li, Y.and Li, S. 2012. Dietary supplement of fructooligosaccharides and Bacillus subtilis enhances the growth rate and disease resistance of the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka). Aquac. Res., 43:1328–
  182. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02936.x U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2008. Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Controls Guidance Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Medicine. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/food/guidanceregulation/ucm251970.pdf.
  183. Verschuere, L., G. Rombaut, P. Sorgeloos, and W.
  184. Verstraete. 2000. Probiotic Bacteria as Biological Control Agents in Aquaculture. Microbiology and Molecular Biology, 64(4):655-671.
  185. Wright, G. D. 2010. Antibiotic resistance in the
  186. environment: a link to the clinic. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 13(5): 589-594.
  187. Xiong, J., K. Wang, J. Wu, L. Qiuqian, K. Yang, Y.
  188. Qian, and D. Zhang. 2015. Changes in intestinal bacterial communities are closely associated with shrimp disease severity. Applied microbiology and biotechnology,99(16): 6911-6919.
  189. Zhou Z., Z. Ding and H.Y. Lv. 2007. Effects of dietary short-chain fructooligosaccharides on intestinal microflora, survival and growth performance of juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 38: 296-301.
  190. Zokaeifar, H., Balcázar, J. L., Saad, C. R., Kamarudin, M. S., Sijam, K., Arshad, A., and Nejat, N. 2012. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on the growth performance, digestive enzymes, immune gene expression and disease resistance of white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish & shellfish immunology, 33(4): 683-689.