Main Article Content

Abstract

Social media becomes a substantial advantage for society, including fishpreneurs. A fishpreneur can be defined as a small-scale fish farmer with entrepreneurial behavior and who implements innovative actions as well as managerial strategies. Most fishpreneurs still encounter issues such as lack of knowledge in obtaining information. Fishpreneur characteristics can be seen by some aspects such as, build or developing self-branding in fishpreneur’s activities, being financially committed, desiring on pursuing new things, innovative, visionary mindset, willing to take a risk, assertive, and optimistic. Several aspects of marketing and production improvement can be mentioned, namely market segmentation, market analysis, competitor analysis, and promotion. as well as land resources, the feasibility factor for cultivation, and the level of cultivation technology. This study aims to analyze how the fishpreneur’s character impacts the utilization of social media to enhance their production and marketing of aquaculture in Gunung Pati, Semarang. A quantitative approach was used in this research. A set of questionnaires as a measuring tool was carefully developed and validated and were distributed to 23 fish farmers. The result showed a significant effect of fishpreneur’s characters on the utilization of social media to enhance production (sig 0,000) and marketing (sig 0.000) of freshwater aquaculture in Semarang City.

Keywords

Character; Fishpreneur; Marketing; Production, Social media

Article Details

Author Biographies

Endiva Dian Septiara, Diponegoro University

Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science

Tita Elfitasari, Diponegoro University

Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science

Rosa Amalia, Diponegoro University

Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science

References

  1. Adhimursandi, D. 2016. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Niat Kewirausahaan. Kinerja: Jurnal Ekonomi and Manajemen.13(1): 193-210
  2. Aji, P. M., V. Nadhila and L. Sanny. 2020.Effect of Social Media Marketing on Instagram Towards Purchase Intention: Evidence from Indonesia’s Ready-To-Drink Tea Industry. International Journal of Data and Network Science. 4(2): 91-104
  3. Alita, D., A.D. Putra and D. Darwis. 2021. Analysis of classic assumption test and multiple linear regression coefficient test for employee structural office recommendation. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems).15(3):1-5
  4. Al Roubaie, A. 2018. Bridging the Knowledge Divide in GCC Countries: The Role of Digital Technologies. In Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society.164-180. Spinger, Cham
  5. Amanda, L., F. Yanuar and D. Devianto. 2019. Uji Validitas and Reliabilitas Tingkat Partisipasi Politik Masyarakat Kota Paandg. Jurnal Matematika. 8(1): 179-188.
  6. Andriyanto, S. 2013. Kondisi Terkini Budidaya Ikan Bandeng di Kabupaten Pati, Jawa Tengah. Media Akuakultur. 8(2): 139-144.
  7. Ariadi, H and Z. Abidin. 2019. Kajian Pola Kemitraan Antara Pembenih Ikan Nila (Oreochromis niloticus) dengan Balai Benih Ikan (BBI) Klemunan di Wlingi, Kabupaten Blitar. ECSOFIM: Economic and Social of Fisheries and Marine Journal. 6(2): 194-201.
  8. Arreola, M. F. 2016. The Emergence of The Social Media Entrepreneur. ESSCA School of Management. 56: 1-2
  9. Atmaja, K. A and N. S. W. Wijaya. 2019. Pengembangan Sistem Melalui Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen (E-Kuesioner) STMK STIKOM Indonesia. Jurnal Sains and Teknologi. 8(1): 55–64.
  10. Bahrun, S., S. Alifah and S. Mulyono. 2018. Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Survey Pemasaran and Penjualan Berbasis Web.TRANSISTOR Elektro and Informatika. 2(2): 81-88.
  11. Bergen, M and M. A. Peteraf. 2002. Competitor Identification and Competitor Analysis: A Broad-based Managerial Approach. Managerial and Decision Economics. 23(4-5):157-169
  12. Camilleri, M.A. 2018. Market segmentation, targeting and positioning. In Travel marketing, tourism economics and the airline product (pp. 69-83). Springer, Cham.
  13. Campbell, S., M. Greenwood., S. Prior., T. Shearer., K. Walkem., S. Young., D. Bywaters and K. Walker. 2020. Purposive Sampling: Complex or Simple? Research
  14. Case Examples. Journal of Research in Nursing. 25(8): 652-661
  15. Cesaroni, F. M and D. Consoli. 2015. Are Small Businesses Really Able to Take Advantage of Social Media?. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. 13(4): 257-268.
  16. Chen, S. C and C. P. Lin. 2019. Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities:The Mediation of Social Identification, Perceived Value, and Satisfaction. 140:22-32
  17. Dikananda, A. R., F. A. Pratama and A. R. Rinaldi. 2019. E-Learning Satisfaction Menggunakan Metode Auto Model. Jurnal Informatika: Pengembangan IT. 4(2): 159-164.
  18. Dwipayana, I. M. H., P. E. D. M. Dewi and I. N. P. Yasa. 2018. Pengaruh Program Samsat Corner, Samsat Keliling And Kepuasan Wajib Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Dalam Membayar Pajak Kendaraan Bermotor (Pkb)(Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Bersama Sistem Administrasi Manunggal Di Bawah Satu Atap (SAMSAT) Denpasar). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi) Undiksha. 8(2): 1-2
  19. Dwivedi, Y. K., E. Ismagilova., D. L. Hughes., J. Carlson., R. Filieri., J. Jacobson., V. Jain., H. Karjaluto., H. Kefi., A. S. Krishen., V. Kumar., M. M. Rahman., R. Raman., P. A. Rauschnabel., J. Rowley., J. Salo., G. A.
  20. Tran and Y. Wang. 2020. Setting The Future of Digital and Social Media Marketing Research: Perspectives and Research Propositions. 59. 102168: 1-37
  21. Elfitasari, T., Sya’rani, L., and Albert. 2021. Fishpreneur: A New Paradigm of Small-scale Aquaculture. AACL Bioflux. 14(3): 1406-1416
  22. Fischer, E and A. R. Reuber. 2011. Social Interaction Via New Social Media: (How) Can Interactions on Twitter Affect Effectual Thinking and Behavior?. Journal of Business Venturing. 26(1): 1-18.
  23. Garland, R. 1991. The Mid-point on a Rating Scale: Is it desirable. Marketing Bulletin. 2(1): 66-70.
  24. Hanna, R., A. Rohm and V. L. Crittenden. 2011. We’re All Connected: The Power of the Social Media Ecosystem. Business Horizons. 54(3): 267-273
  25. Harrigan, P and M. Miles. 2014. From e-CRM to s-CRM. Critical Factors Underpinning The Social CRM Activities of SMEs. Small Enterprise Research. 21(1): 96-116
  26. Hartini, S., F. H. A. Putro and T. Setiawan. 2020. Pemanfaatan Media Sosial sebagai Media Komunikasi Pemasaran Modern. DIGIKOM: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 1(1): 33-37.
  27. Hartono, H., K. Hutomo and M. Mayangsari. 2012. Pengaruh Strategi Pemasaran terhadap Peningkatan Penjualan pada Perusahaan dengan Menetapkan Alumni and Mahasiswa Universiatas Bina Nusantara sebagai Objek Penelitian. Binus Business Review. 3(2): 882-897.
  28. Hendri, R., E. Yulinda., H. Arief. 2019. Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Media Sosial untuk Meningkatkan Pemasaran Produk Olahan Ikan Di Desa Hangtuah Kabupaten Kampar Provinsi Riau. Journal of Rural and Urban Community Empowerment, 1(1): 51-60.
  29. Herawati, H and D. Mulyani. 2016. Pengaruh Kualitas Bahan Baku and Proses Produksi terhadap Kaulitas Produk pada UD. Tahu Rosyidi Puspan Maron Probolinggo. Dinamika Global: Rebranding Keunggulan Kompetitif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: 463-482
  30. Janti, S. 2014. Analisis Validitas and Reliabilitas dengan Skala Likert terhadap Pengembangan Si/Ti dalam Penentuan Pengambilan Keputusan Penerapan Strategic Planning pada Industri Garmen. Prosiding SNAST. 155-160
  31. Jiang, H., Y. Luo and O. Kulemeka. 2016. Social Media Engagement as An Evaluation Barometer: Insights from Communication Executives. Public Relation Review. 42(4): 679-691
  32. Kozubíková, L., J. Dvorský., M. Cepel and A. P. Balcerzak. 2017. Important characteristics of an entrepreneur in relation to risk taking: Czech Republic case study. Journal of International Studies. 10 (3): 220-233
  33. Subali, M. A. P., I. G. R. A. Sugiartha and A. F. Akbar. 2020. Peningkatan Kuantitas dan Kualitas Produksi Kerupuk Basadi Desa Jegu,Kabupaten Tabanan. DINAMISIA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 4(4): 730-736.
  34. Olanrewaju, A. S. T., M. A. Hossain., N. Whiteside and P. Mercieca. 2020. Social Media and Entrepreneurship Research: A Literature Review. International Journal of Information Management. 50: 90–110.
  35. Phonthanukitithaworn, C., C. Ketkaew and P. Naruetharadhol. 2019. Relevant Factors for Success as an Online Entrepreneur in Thailand. Sage Open. 9(1): 1-20.
  36. Pramiyati, T., Jayanta and Yulnelly. 2017. Peran Data Primer pada Pembentukan Skema Konseptual yang Faktual (Studi Kasus: Skema Konseptual Basis Data Simbumil. Jurnal SIMETRIS. 8(2): 679-686.
  37. Pranatawijaya, V. H., Widiatry., R. Priskila and P. B. A. A. Putra. 2019. Penerapan Skala Likert and Skala Dikotomi Pada Kuesioner Online. Jurnal Sains and Informatika. 5(2):128-137.
  38. Rinaldi., L. Bathara., H. Hamid. 2014. Analisis Perkembangan Produksi Perikanan Budidaya di Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Provinsi Riau. [Doctoral dissertation, Riau University]
  39. Reza, F. 2016. Strategi promosi penjualan online lazada. co. id. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi. 4(1): 63-74.
  40. Saefuloh, D. 2020. Rekognisi Terhadap Peluang Bisnis Online Melalui Media Sosial and Hubungannya dengan Minat Berwirausaha: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Politeknik Negeri Bandung. Jurnal Bisnis and Kewirausahaan. 16(1): 12-23.
  41. Sugiyono. 2016. Qualitative Research Methods, Quantitative and R & D. Alfabeta. Bandung.
  42. Sukadi, M. F. 2002. Peningkatan Teknologi Budidaya Perikanan (The Improvement of Fish Culture Technology). Jurnal Iktiologi Indonesia. 2(2): 61-66.
  43. Sutarjo, G. A and S. Samsundari. 2018. Peningkatan Produksi Budidaya Ikan Air Tawar Melalui Penerapan Manajemen Kualitas Air and Pembuatan Pakan Ikan Mandiri di Kelompok Pembudidaya Ikan “Sumber Rejeki” and “Cinta Alam” Kecamatan Bungatan Kabupaten Situbondo. Jurnal Dedikasi. 15(1): 1-4
  44. Trimmel, M and K. Trimmel. 2017. Rating Comfort and Every-Day Mood States (TRIM-S): Comparing Likert Scales with Visual Analog Scales (VAS) and Relations to Cardiovascular Response. 10(1): 14-28.
  45. Welter. C and S. Kim. 2018. Effectuation Under Risk and Uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing. 33(1): 100-116.