Main Article Content

Abstract

Aquaculture industries in general face several sustainability issues as the operations still rely on the quality of available water resources. Most aquaculture systems utilize common water resources in the production as well as discharging effluents from the farm; hence water is still considered as the major factor in spreading diseases in an area where aquaculture production is concentrated. Moreover, most input sources (e.g feeds, seeds and chemicals) in most cases are also similar (or shared) among aquaculture producers in the area. The most common recommended best management practices nowadays, including those from the national and commercial aquaculture standards, limit the requirements in addressing management issues that can be controlled within the farm only and that the outside environment (e.g. rivers and coastal areas) in most cases is overlooked. Producers are commonly advised to improve their individual practices in order to achieve higher production and limiting the occurrence of disease within the farm. The Sustainable Fisheries Partnership (SFP) as an organization that promotes sustainable practices in fisheries and farming, recognizing the cumulative impact of aquaculture on receiving water bodies where aquaculture production is pooled and intensified. Due to the minimal (if not lacking) regulations and coordination among producers on the use of water resources and effluent discharge,sourcing inputs, stocking events, reporting of disease outbreak and the use of drugs and chemicals, the fate of aquaculture as a whole is uncertain. This paper introduces the five pillars of zonal management where scientific information (carrying capacity and epidemiology) are critical as well as the laws and regulations in order to develop better management recommendations that would cover an aquaculture zone. Moreover, this paper provides updates on the different approaches applied in aquaculture zones in China, Indonesia and Thailand in pursuit to a more sustainable practice in aquaculture through zonal management. The approach uses a multi-stakeholder strategy where key players of the aquaculture industry play a critical role. The paper highlights that there is no strategy that would fit in all aquaculture zones rather would mainly depend on the status of the industry, hence the level of importance and the role that each stakeholder plays may not be the same in all zones.

Keywords

Aquaculture certification; Aquaculture improvement project; Best management practices; Cumulative impacts; Zonal management.

Article Details

Author Biographies

Ernesto J. Morales, Sustainable Fisheries Partnership

Aquaculture Technical Director,

Anton Immink, Sustainable Fisheries Partnership

Aquaculture Director

Pamudi Pamudi, Sustainable Fisheries Partnership

Aquaculture Director,

Linh Nguyen Thanh, Sustainable Fisheries Partnership

Aquaculture Director,

Han Han, China Blue Sustainability

China Blue Sustainability

References

  1. Brugère, C., N. Ridler, G. Haylor, G. Macfadyen
  2. and N. Hishamunda. 2010. Aquaculture
  3. planning, policy formulation and
  4. implementation for sustainable development.
  5. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical
  6. Paper. No. 542. Rome, FAO. 70 pp. (also
  7. available at www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1601e/
  8. i1601e00.pdf).
  9. Corsin, F., S. Funge-Smith, and J. Clausen. 2007. A
  10. qualitative assessment of standards and
  11. certification schemes applicable to
  12. aquaculture in the Asia-Pacific region. RAP
  13. Publication 2007/25, 98pp.
  14. FAO. 2014. The State of World Fisheries and
  15. Aquaculture. Opportunities and challenges,
  16. pp.
  17. Huchzermeyer, K.D.A., and M.G. Bondad-
  18. Reantaso. 2017. Biosecurity, zoning and
  19. compartments, infected zones, disease-free
  20. zones. In: J. Aguilar-Manjarrez, D. Soto, and
  21. R. Brummett (Eds.). Aquaculture zoning, site
  22. selection and area management under the
  23. ecosystem approach to aquaculture. Full
  24. document, pp 87-94. Report ACS113536.
  25. Rome, FAO, and World Bank Group.
  26. Washington DC, 395 pp.
  27. Immink, A. and J. Clausen. 2017. Aquaculture
  28. Certification and Zonal Management. In: J.
  29. Aguilar-Manjarrez, D. Soto, and R.
  30. Brummett (Eds.). Aquaculture zoning, site
  31. selection and area management under the
  32. ecosystem approach to aquaculture. Full
  33. document, pp 87-94. Report ACS113536.
  34. Rome, FAO, and World Bank Group.
  35. Washington DC, 395 pp.
  36. Immink, A., H. Han, Pamudi, and J. Morales.
  37. Zonal aquculture management in
  38. China and Indonesia. In: J. Aguilar-
  39. Manjarrez, D. Soto, and R. Brummett (Eds.).
  40. Aquaculture zoning, site selection and area
  41. management under the ecosystem approach
  42. to aquaculture. Full document, pp. 198-221.
  43. Report ACS113536. Rome, FAO, and World
  44. Bank Group, Washington, DC. 395 pp.
  45. MRC. 2005. Overview of the Hydrology of the
  46. Mekong Basin. Mekong River Commission,
  47. Vientiane, Laos.
  48. OECD. 2010. Advancing the aquaculture agenda:
  49. Workshop proceedings. Organization for
  50. Economic Cooperation and Development,
  51. OECD Publishing, Paris, France.
  52. OIE. 2015. Aquatic Animal Health Code. Updated
  53. annually at http://www.oie.int/en/international
  54. -standard-setting/aquatic-code/.
  55. Rice, M.A. 2014. Extension programming in support
  56. of public policy for the management of
  57. aquaculture in common water bodies.
  58. Aquacultura Indonesiana, 15 (1) : 26-31.
  59. Ross, L.G., T.C. Telfer, L. Falconer, D. Soto, and J.
  60. Aguilar-Manjarrez. 2013. Site selection and
  61. carrying capacities for inland and coastal
  62. aquculture. FAO/Institute of Aquaculture,
  63. University of Stirling, Expert Workshop, 6-8
  64. December 2010. Stirling, the United
  65. Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
  66. Ireland. FAO Fisheries and Aquculture
  67. Proceedings No. 21. Rome, FAO. 46 pp.
  68. Staples, D. and S. Funge-Smith. 2009. Ecosystem
  69. approach to fisheries and aquaculture:
  70. Implementing the FAO Code of Conduct for
  71. Responsible Fisheries. FAO Regional Office
  72. for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
  73. RAP Publication 2009/11, 48pp.
  74. Subasinghe, R.P., S.E. McGladdery, and B.J. Hill.
  75. Surveillance and zoning for aquatic
  76. animals diseases. FAO Fisheries Technical
  77. Paper. No. 451. FAO, Rome, 73pp.
  78. Tilman, D., K.G. Cassman, P.A. Matson, R.
  79. Naylor, and S. Polasky. 2002. Agricultural
  80. sustainability and intensive production
  81. practices. Nature, 418:671-677.
  82. World Bank. 2013. Growing aquaculture in
  83. sustainable ecosystems. Agriculture and
  84. Environmental Services.